money is a central force in U.S. presidential elections


 The role of money in U.S. presidential elections is not just significant—it's often decisive. The ability to raise and spend vast amounts of money is crucial for candidates to build name recognition, fund extensive campaign operations, and advertise across various media. This financial muscle can make or break a campaign, particularly in a country as large and diverse as the United States, where reaching voters in different states requires substantial resources.

Historical Context

In 2008, the Democratic Party set a fundraising record by collecting $1.2 billion for the presidential election. Barack Obama, the party's nominee, raised an unprecedented $778 million, which helped fuel his successful campaign. This record stood for several years, reflecting the growing importance of campaign finance in modern elections.

However, the 2020 presidential election shattered all previous records. The Democratic Party raised a staggering $3.2 billion, demonstrating the ever-increasing financial stakes in U.S. politics. Joe Biden, the Democratic nominee, and Michael Bloomberg, who also sought the Democratic nomination, each raised over $1 billion. In contrast, Donald Trump, the incumbent Republican president, raised over $800 million, a substantial sum but still less than his Democratic rivals.

2024 Election and Current Fundraising

As the 2024 election approaches, the trend of massive fundraising continues. According to the Federal Election Commission (FEC), over $1.09 billion has already been raised by various candidates. This early fundraising is critical for candidates to build momentum, hire staff, and start advertising, particularly in key battleground states.

Fundraising Mechanisms

Candidates receive funding primarily through two channels:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

  1. Individual Donations: Candidates' campaign committees solicit direct contributions from individual supporters. For the 2024 election, individuals can donate up to $3,300 per candidate per election, an increase from the $2,900 limit in 2022. Since there are typically two main phases of the election (the primaries and the general election), an individual can donate up to $6,600 to a single candidate over the entire election cycle.

  2. Political Action Committees (PACs) and Super PACs: These committees can raise unlimited amounts of money from corporations, unions, associations, and individuals. However, Super PACs cannot coordinate directly with the candidates they support. These committees play a critical role in modern elections by funding advertisements, grassroots mobilization, and other activities that support or oppose candidates.

Economic Influence and Donor Preferences

The state of the economy heavily influences donor behavior. For instance, Donald Trump’s “America First” economic policies, which emphasize protectionism and reducing imports, particularly from China, appeal to certain domestic industries and business leaders. These supporters often include companies and individuals who benefit from reduced foreign competition or who prioritize American manufacturing and job creation.

On the other hand, companies with global operations, particularly in technology and finance, tend to favor candidates who support international trade and economic integration. These sectors have shown significant support for Democratic candidates, such as Kamala Harris, who align more closely with their economic interests.

The Role of Billionaire Donors

Wealthy individuals, particularly billionaires, exert considerable influence on U.S. elections through their financial contributions. For example, in Trump's 2020 campaign, 26 of his top billionaire supporters, with a combined net worth of $143 billion, contributed around $162 million. High-profile billionaires like Elon Musk and Bill Ackman, along with the CEO of JPMorgan Chase, Jamie Dimon, were among those supporting Trump’s re-election efforts.

Conversely, Kamala Harris, who is positioned as a key Democratic figure, has garnered support from other billionaire donors who favor more progressive or centrist economic policies. These donors often have interests in sectors like technology, healthcare, and finance, where Democratic policies might align more closely with their business strategies.


In summary, money is a central force in U.S. presidential elections, enabling candidates to communicate their message, mobilize voters, and build the infrastructure needed for a successful campaign. The 2020 election highlighted the escalating costs of running for president, with both major parties raising record-breaking amounts. The 2024 election seems poised to continue this trend, with candidates already raising significant funds early in the campaign cycle. The sources and amounts of these funds reflect broader economic interests and ideological divides, making campaign finance a crucial aspect of understanding U.S. electoral dynamics.                                                                                                                 Global Financial Markets in Turmoil Amid Concerns Over US Economy